Thing 6

Digg seems like it could be a useful tool. They have things broken down in to catagories and subcatagories. I could see this taking a lot more time than utilizing the library sources. It seems like it could take a lot of time to narrow things down as well as check the credibility of the source. To establish a reputation or credibility Digg can be used to post articles that you have found and are interested in. The more educational, credible sources you post the better you would look.
Honestly I don't know that Reddit using Twitter would really save a lot of time. So often I see people getting really frustrated with how often they get updates on these various sites. Not to mention I can't imagine it would be easy to sift through all of the twits (or whatever you call them). Again this is another time when you would have to research the post or information to ensure credibility. I could go onto one of these open sites and say I am a brain surgeon and post stuff about neurosurgery. Everything I would post would be under false pretence. You would have to verify the original source, then verify that the source is who they say they are, then you would have to verify the accuracy. It all seems like a waste to me.
Really I don't care enough about Tila or Nikki to know who would treat the dogs well. I also have no idea who this baby lotion lady is. So, maybe it would be best for them to share...